<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mihai Spanoche&#187; antivirus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mihai.spanoche.com/tag/antivirus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mihai.spanoche.com</link>
	<description>TECH NEWS / GUIDES / REVIEWS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kaspersky 2010 &#8211; switching from Panda</title>
		<link>http://mihai.spanoche.com/2009/12/kaspersky-2010-switching-from-panda/</link>
		<comments>http://mihai.spanoche.com/2009/12/kaspersky-2010-switching-from-panda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaspersky vs panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda vs kaspersky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mihai.spanoche.com/2009/12/kaspersky-2010-switching-from-panda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe it was February or March I have purchased for only $30 the Pro edition of Panda Anti-virus with a bonus of 3 PC licenses included in the pack. However I don&#8217;t recomment it anymore, huge memory load (in XP went up instantly from 309MB to 745MB), lazy updates , not the best AV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was February or March I have purchased for only $30 the Pro edition of Panda Anti-virus with a bonus of 3 PC licenses included in the pack. However I don&#8217;t recomment it anymore, huge memory load (in XP went up instantly from 309MB to 745MB), lazy updates , not the best AV for sure.</p>
<p>Today I have started the trial for Kastersky AV , highly recommended by a lot of IT guys these days. See you back in a month with a short review.<div id="attachment_154" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 290px"><img src="http://www.spanoche.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/kaspersky_blog_2010.jpg" alt="kaspersky av 2010" title="kaspersky_blog_2010" width="280" height="280" class="size-full wp-image-154" /><p class="wp-caption-text">kaspersky av 2010</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mihai.spanoche.com/2009/12/kaspersky-2010-switching-from-panda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

